<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 50mm Duel: Zeiss 50mm 1.7 planar T* vs Canon 50mm 1.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/01/50mm-duel-zeiss-50mm-1-7-planar-t-vs-canon-50mm-1-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/01/50mm-duel-zeiss-50mm-1-7-planar-t-vs-canon-50mm-1-4/</link>
	<description>Blog about News, Tips and tutorial about HDSLR cameras</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: buy r4 dsi</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/01/50mm-duel-zeiss-50mm-1-7-planar-t-vs-canon-50mm-1-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5820</link>
		<dc:creator>buy r4 dsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1564#comment-5820</guid>
		<description>I ended buying the Zeiss Planar 50mm 1.4 MM, but I think I prefer the Pen tax 1.4 just because I do, and it&#039;s way cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ended buying the Zeiss Planar 50mm 1.4 MM, but I think I prefer the Pen tax 1.4 just because I do, and it&#8217;s way cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UA</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/01/50mm-duel-zeiss-50mm-1-7-planar-t-vs-canon-50mm-1-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5751</link>
		<dc:creator>UA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1564#comment-5751</guid>
		<description>nice test
i have an old planar T 50mm 1,4 c/y, which i am very happy with video
it is much better wide open than the canon 1.4.
this lens has als a sort of foldable flexible rubber hood - never seen such design on any othe lens.
and i think the Zeiss Ikon 1.4/50mm Planar T* ZEis the update to this lens, not the 1.7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice test<br />
i have an old planar T 50mm 1,4 c/y, which i am very happy with video<br />
it is much better wide open than the canon 1.4.<br />
this lens has als a sort of foldable flexible rubber hood &#8211; never seen such design on any othe lens.<br />
and i think the Zeiss Ikon 1.4/50mm Planar T* ZEis the update to this lens, not the 1.7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeiss 50mm T1.7 and Canon 50mm T1.4 Shoot Off. &#187; cinema5D news</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/01/50mm-duel-zeiss-50mm-1-7-planar-t-vs-canon-50mm-1-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5682</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeiss 50mm T1.7 and Canon 50mm T1.4 Shoot Off. &#187; cinema5D news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1564#comment-5682</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is a very quick take on the flairing differences between an Older Zeiss 50mm T1.7 Planar and a Canon 50mm T1.4. Â There is a short review and more test videos in the link. The Video tests are not great but you get the picture.Â Click Here For More Video Tests. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is a very quick take on the flairing differences between an Older Zeiss 50mm T1.7 Planar and a Canon 50mm T1.4. Â There is a short review and more test videos in the link. The Video tests are not great but you get the picture.Â Click Here For More Video Tests. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 283/302 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.canon5dtips.com @ 2012-02-07 13:44:37 -->
