<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going wide: Wide angle for the 5DMrkII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/</link>
	<description>Blog about News, Tips and tutorial about HDSLR cameras</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webnews #2: Heyail to the Soul &#124; Andi Licious&#39; BlogosphÃ¤re</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/comment-page-1/#comment-6108</link>
		<dc:creator>Webnews #2: Heyail to the Soul &#124; Andi Licious&#39; BlogosphÃ¤re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1572#comment-6108</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon5Dtips gab es zu lesen, wie weitwinkelig welche Weitwinkel-Objektive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon5Dtips gab es zu lesen, wie weitwinkelig welche Weitwinkel-Objektive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/comment-page-1/#comment-6104</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1572#comment-6104</guid>
		<description>@Fadzter: I dont see it as such a big issue for video because: (1) video shoots at a  lower resolution and (2) moving subjects are much more forgiving regarding sharpness. So while it is a good lens for video, I wouldnt use it for stills unless I really have to! Also, dont forget the goal here is to have a somewhat shallow DoF so much of the unsharp areas could end up in the bokeh (depending of your composition)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fadzter: I dont see it as such a big issue for video because: (1) video shoots at a  lower resolution and (2) moving subjects are much more forgiving regarding sharpness. So while it is a good lens for video, I wouldnt use it for stills unless I really have to! Also, dont forget the goal here is to have a somewhat shallow DoF so much of the unsharp areas could end up in the bokeh (depending of your composition)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fadzter</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/comment-page-1/#comment-6103</link>
		<dc:creator>Fadzter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1572#comment-6103</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the fab comparison... very helpful.

I understand the Tokina 11-16 f2.8 also mounts on a full-frame body, and is usable @ 16mm as a &quot;prime&quot;. Anything below 15.5mm on a 5D brings the barrel into the field of view as it&#039;s built as an EF-S.

Excellent sample video here:
http://vimeo.com/2850369

Also regarding the Sigma 20mm 1.8, there&#039;s a detailed review highlighting issues of sharpness at the widest apertures (http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-20mm-f-1.8-EX-DG-Lens-Review.aspx). Is this significant enough in video to be an issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the fab comparison&#8230; very helpful.</p>
<p>I understand the Tokina 11-16 f2.8 also mounts on a full-frame body, and is usable @ 16mm as a &#8220;prime&#8221;. Anything below 15.5mm on a 5D brings the barrel into the field of view as it&#8217;s built as an EF-S.</p>
<p>Excellent sample video here:<br />
<a href="http://vimeo.com/2850369" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/2850369</a></p>
<p>Also regarding the Sigma 20mm 1.8, there&#8217;s a detailed review highlighting issues of sharpness at the widest apertures (<a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-20mm-f-1.8-EX-DG-Lens-Review.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-20mm-f-1.8-EX-DG-Lens-Review.aspx</a>). Is this significant enough in video to be an issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Reisch</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/comment-page-1/#comment-6102</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Reisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1572#comment-6102</guid>
		<description>thanks for this article! the widest i&#039;ve had on my 5D mark II or *any* of my canon&#039;s have been 24mm. i&#039;ve always wanted to go wide but i feared the low Apertures. very informative look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this article! the widest i&#8217;ve had on my 5D mark II or *any* of my canon&#8217;s have been 24mm. i&#8217;ve always wanted to go wide but i feared the low Apertures. very informative look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/comment-page-1/#comment-6101</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1572#comment-6101</guid>
		<description>The Tokina is a great lens, but for crop sensor bodies. It would not work with the 5D. As stated in Dan initial post, even on the 1.3x crop body, he is losing the widest part of the field of view, on a full frame body, it would be even worst (I even wonder if the mount wouldnt even hit the mirror!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tokina is a great lens, but for crop sensor bodies. It would not work with the 5D. As stated in Dan initial post, even on the 1.3x crop body, he is losing the widest part of the field of view, on a full frame body, it would be even worst (I even wonder if the mount wouldnt even hit the mirror!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/comment-page-1/#comment-6100</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1572#comment-6100</guid>
		<description>The Samyang is not available yet so I did not talk about it. Also, 14@2.8 will not give much control over DoF unfortunately, which was the goal of the article. 

I still think the Sigma is the way to go for someone looking for bokeh / DoF control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Samyang is not available yet so I did not talk about it. Also, 14@2.8 will not give much control over DoF unfortunately, which was the goal of the article. </p>
<p>I still think the Sigma is the way to go for someone looking for bokeh / DoF control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/comment-page-1/#comment-6099</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1572#comment-6099</guid>
		<description>What about the Tokina 11-16mm Æ’2.8?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the Tokina 11-16mm Æ’2.8?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vision</title>
		<link>http://www.canon5dtips.com/2010/03/going-wide-wide-angle-for-the-5dmrkii/comment-page-1/#comment-6098</link>
		<dc:creator>vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canon5dtips.com/?p=1572#comment-6098</guid>
		<description>You would consider upcoming manual focusing Samyang 14mm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would consider upcoming manual focusing Samyang 14mm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 373/392 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.canon5dtips.com @ 2012-02-07 13:09:24 -->
