Shoot flat or not?

This article is a reaction to a post on PhotoCine News about the validity of shooting flat with HDSLR. The article is interesting and worth a read.

To summarize: contrary to popular believes, you should not shoot flat, instead you should use a picture style that matches as closely as possible the target look. While I agree with this statement and the reasons backing it (output format of the 5D is a lossy compression), I think this is an incredibly bad advice to give to 95% of the population because the reasoning behind it does not apply to them.

First, we rarely know how the footage is going to end up and we are rarely able to influence the environment we shoot in. This means you could be shooting in custom picture style that pushes toward orange and later on realize that it does not work with what you had in mind. Correcting the footage could then be much more complicated and involve quality lost.

Using Shane as a reference proves me point: Shane shoots movie where everything is already decided before going on set and he has total control over the lighting, cloths people are going to wear and locations. Having such a high level of control allows him to be confident that his footage will end up in the sweet spot of the exposure curve, work well with his “Shane look” and there will be no extreme values. Because he has such a high level of control, he knows what to expect from the camera so he can trust the clips as being as close as his desired results as they can in camera.

On the other hand, someone like me and you, who is shooting guerilla style, has much less control over the light. Shooting flat allows us to protect our clips from high variations of exposure from one scene to the next or even within the same sequence if the subject is partly lit (dont forget that reducing the contrast protects us against the limited dynamic range of the camera). Since we dont have control over much, we need an insurance that we can recover as much of the image as we can and that is what a flat picture style gives us. We might lose some quality by doing so, but that is the price of this ‘insurance’.

Moral of the story is: shooting flat give you more flexibility in post production for your grading and exposure at the cost of additional time while shooting with a custom picture style gives you a better starting image and less work in post production at the expense of time spent in preparation and lack of flexibility in post.

Pick the philosophy that fits your needs.

I am currently testing a workflow that would insure the best possible image quality. It is ridiculously time consuming but I will use it for my footage from my Iceland trip and report on it afterward.

BTW, I am still in Iceland and the country is incredibly photogenic. Here is a small clip from what I shot yesterday, in the rain. And in the wind. And in the cold…

DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookEmail

Fader ND review follow up

Following the comment of PH Photography on the quality of the Fader ND, I decided to do more extensive testing. As I was stating in my original review, I was having great results while using the Fader ND in video mode with my 24-70 (main video lens).

So, today, I decided to review what I have shot so far in Iceland with the filter. Up until this morning, everything was shot with the 17-40L4 and was good enough to be put on the web at 720p. So I was having different results than what PH Photography was getting. Then, I reviewed the clips shot with the filter mounted on my 400L5.6. Oh boy!

These clips are not sharp at all. While very usable for web display in a downscaled window (as on Vimeo), the 100% crop was not satisfying at all.

I understand that using a variable filter at such a long focal range is not common so this might be the reason why so few people have reported the issue. That being said, I am getting very good results with my other lenses. If someone has a 400mm lens and a Sihn Ray, I would love to hear your results.

Now that I think about it, anyone else experienced sharpness issues with the Fader ND on a telephoto lens?

Should you forget about the Fader ND?

Fortunately, the Fader ND manufacturer is coming very soon with a revised version of the product which will be using much higher quality glass. Cant wait to test these out. Until then, I will not use the filter on any of my long focals.

DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookEmail

Do you know 500px?

At the end of 2009, I asked you, the readers, what you wanted to see in 2010 on the blog. I know it is hard to tell but I have been working intensely on every single point you asked for and results will unfold in the next few months. It just seems like having a full time job is a major obstacle to getting things done!

Anyways, one of the topic people asked me to talk more about was photography. Video is all cool and flashy but most of us are were, at the core, photographers.

This time, I am not going to talk about gear or plugin but simply a website dedicated to sharing images. It is called 500px. It is very easy to compare it to flickr and the like since they have a lot of features in common but I think it is a step above the rest for one thing: how easy it is to browse gorgeous images.

The principle is simple: users browse and vote for images they like to make them popular. The more popular an image is, the higher its score. There are no albums, groups or the like created and managed by users. This somehow protect the site from comment spam as is so commonly seen on Flickr.

Dont get me wrong. I like Flickr, I just find the user experience as a viewer and as a photographer more pleasant on 500px. While I rarely randomly browse pics on Flick, I spend a lot of time in the popular and architecture section. Both sites were designed with different goals. Flickr is a community where everything goes while 500px is designed to showcase work of art. The best example? The size of the images they are more than twice as big on 500px!

The site is still in its growing phase and there arent millions of user yet so it is the perfect time to register (free, use the invite code: youwelcome) and grab your namespace. I cant remember the last time I could register on a site using only alain(!).

Time now for a shameless plug, if you are curious to see my work, you can see it here. As you will soon discover, having people rate your pictures can be scary and fun at the same time.

Disclaimer: I discovered 500px when Ian, its co-founder, placed an order for Fader ND filters. So yes, there is a tiny financial relationship between us but I will let you be the judge of its impact on the content of my post.

Update: added the invite code


DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookEmail

Fader ND filter from LCW review

Disclaimer: Light Craft Workshop is now a sponsor of Canon5dTips.com. If you read the sponsorship page, you know that I only agree to promote products that I actually use and love. So if it wasn’t good, I would not recommend you to buy one, as my painful Pocket Wizard TTL experience proved.

If you don’t know what a ND filter is or why you need one, take a look at this post on the subject (coming soon).

[Read more...]

DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookEmail

Surprise of the Day: RRM MicroRemote

By now, you have probably seen the cool pictures, posted first on M. Laforet site but I am posting one of these again because it looks too cool.

If you want to see more, you can take a look at Planet5D teaser post. Ahh… Maybe I should have asked them for sponsorship!

So, it looks cool but what is it supposed to do? Photocinenews got the whole explanations here.

Updated (here is a better clip):

The whole system, without the iPhone, will cost under 1k$ .I guess they will also need to make an iPad version of the product… This is ridiculously affordable and it will be on my wish list as soon as I recuperate from the financial hit of my trip to Iceland.

Cool but…

I am very curious about how the system works. As the rep says in the video, lenses need to be calibrated and I wonder if all lenses can work with the system. While I am sure the new Zeiss HDSLR lens series is going to be a perfect match, I have some reserves on the Canon EF lenses. The focus distance progression of these is not linear and often a 1 degree rotation is enough to lose focus. Anyone at the NAB can get more information on how calibration works?

And form Zacuto…

Saw this video from DSLR News Shooter.

The first part of the clip talks about the now famous Tactical shooter, but the second part presents a new cage rig. Nothing spectacular of fancy and very comparable to the one provided by Cinevate, at least by its look. While I am not a big fan of these kind of rigs for hand held shots, I find them very good to get smooth pans once they are set on a tripod.

Dont think about getting more information by visiting these manufacturers website. None has been updated yet.

And a rumor for the end

Two individuals have sent me email about something new coming from Apple tomorrow. But since my track record with rumors has been quite bad recently, I will wait and see.

Finally

If you are at the NAB, send me an email. I have some stuff I would like you to check out for me!

DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookEmail

HDSLR PowerBase 70: battery pack for your 5DMrkII or 7D

The great thing about the NAB is that we will see a lot of new products targeted at the HDSLR market. The bad thing is that most of these wont be available for my trip to Iceland…

The first of these product is the HDSLR PowerBase 70. First, the picture:

[Read more...]

DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookEmail

House season finale shot on Canon 5D!

I never watched House, but I know a lot of people do. I am more the Flashforward type of guy. Anyways, I just found out that show director, Greg Yaitanes, revealed on twitter that they shot the season final with the 5D!

This is big. While Saturday Night Live used the 5D before as did some other shows and commercials, this is the first time the camera is used on a big TV production set that is watched by millions (afaik).

While we all know the merits of the camera, it has often been hard to sell its video capabilities to skeptics. Now, the next time someone says HDSLR can only be used for marginal jobs, we have a great show case to point them to.

Looking at all the tweets, I was surprised to see that they stayed with Canon lenses and simple rigs.

The episode airs on May 17th. And I will be watching it!

BTW, kudos to PhotocineNews for spotting this!

DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookEmail

From the readers: Should I sell my Canon 24-105L4IS?

From the readers is a new category of articles I am working on. As a blogger, I get daily emails about what gear one should buy or how to do X thing. Since the answer to these questions is generally of public interest, I have decided to turn them into articles. If you have any questions you would like answered, feel free to contact me.

Of all the lenses related question touching the 5DmrkII, one that keeps coming up is What should I do with the kit 24-105L4IS? I receive questions about this lens at least once a week and it is a popular topic in forums as well. While I cant provide a straight answer that will hold true for all readers, I think I can give you some interesting pointers.

First, lets see why people have this lens in the first place. Most of the time, it is because it is a popular kit lens. After doing some maths, a lot of prospective buyers saw that if they bought the 5DMrkII kit and sold the lens, they could save some money over the body only box. Proud of their calculation, these fine accountants rush to the store and get the kit then realize how hard it is to sell the 20-104L4IS at their expected price.

Why? Supply and demand. While the 24-105LIS is a great lens (more on this later), too many people did the 5D kit thing and now want to sell theirs too, pushing the price down. While this lens used to worth about the same as the 24-70L, it is now advertised on Craigslist at around 900$ or lower.

But, why people want to sell the lens? Is there something wrong with it? Is there something better for the price? Actually, for its price, the 24-105LIS is an incredible lens. While the f4 aperture might be a bit small for photography work, it is perfect for video. The image quality is very good for still and even better for video and the huge zoom range means that it is a great do it all lens. Add IS to the list and you get a very decent lens for photo and near perfect for all around video. I have shot a few clips with a 24-105 hand held and it worked way better than I expected thanks to its IS. If you dont remember how useful IS can be for video, check this old clip.

So, if it is so great, why so many for sale? From my personal experience, I can see three reasons:

  1. As mentioned above, they think they can turn a quick profit.
  2. They realize (a bit too late) they need a wider aperture lens for their shooting style.
  3. They follow the herd and forum trolls without even giving the lens a real try.

Last night, I was discussing with a few other cinephotographers about how people (mostly converted photographers) want to shoot video wide open while they would get much better results by using a small aperture. Unless your storytelling requires strong subject isolation, an aperture of f4-5.6 is fine for most CU and medium shots.

Let say that you really need a lens with wider aperture. What could one get for selling the lens? While the choice is quite easy for most photographer, since they will pull some more cash out of their wallet and go with the 24-70L2.8, for videographers there are a lot of other options. A popular choice is to go with a Canon 50mm f1.4 and a Canon 85mm f1.8 . These are both excellent lens. If 85 is too long, one could go toward Sigma 20mm f/1.8 (we talked about it before) and the same 50. There are other options and even more if one wants to look at alternative lenses coming from Nikon, Zeiss, etc.

What ever you do, make sure you dont overlap the focal range and that you are getting at least two stops of light in exchange. Also think about the complication involved in a multi-lens kit. Switching lens in the middle of a shoot is not practical, even more so when shooting in a dusty environment.

I just finished reading this post and I am not sure if I managed to clear the situation of just put more confusion into the mix. If I did so, sorry! The general idea behind this post was to show how great the 24-105 is and how hard it is to replace such a versatile tool.

Post publication edit: as stated in the comments, I screwed up and invented 2 lenses… lens models corrected now to reflect current Canon offering!

DeliciousStumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookEmail