From the readers: Should I sell my Canon 24-105L4IS?

From the readers is a new category of articles I am working on. As a blogger, I get daily emails about what gear one should buy or how to do X thing. Since the answer to these questions is generally of public interest, I have decided to turn them into articles. If you have any questions you would like answered, feel free to contact me.

Of all the lenses related question touching the 5DmrkII, one that keeps coming up is What should I do with the kit 24-105L4IS? I receive questions about this lens at least once a week and it is a popular topic in forums as well. While I cant provide a straight answer that will hold true for all readers, I think I can give you some interesting pointers.

First, lets see why people have this lens in the first place. Most of the time, it is because it is a popular kit lens. After doing some maths, a lot of prospective buyers saw that if they bought the 5DMrkII kit and sold the lens, they could save some money over the body only box. Proud of their calculation, these fine accountants rush to the store and get the kit then realize how hard it is to sell the 20-104L4IS at their expected price.

Why? Supply and demand. While the 24-105LIS is a great lens (more on this later), too many people did the 5D kit thing and now want to sell theirs too, pushing the price down. While this lens used to worth about the same as the 24-70L, it is now advertised on Craigslist at around 900$ or lower.

But, why people want to sell the lens? Is there something wrong with it? Is there something better for the price? Actually, for its price, the 24-105LIS is an incredible lens. While the f4 aperture might be a bit small for photography work, it is perfect for video. The image quality is very good for still and even better for video and the huge zoom range means that it is a great do it all lens. Add IS to the list and you get a very decent lens for photo and near perfect for all around video. I have shot a few clips with a 24-105 hand held and it worked way better than I expected thanks to its IS. If you dont remember how useful IS can be for video, check this old clip.

So, if it is so great, why so many for sale? From my personal experience, I can see three reasons:

  1. As mentioned above, they think they can turn a quick profit.
  2. They realize (a bit too late) they need a wider aperture lens for their shooting style.
  3. They follow the herd and forum trolls without even giving the lens a real try.

Last night, I was discussing with a few other cinephotographers about how people (mostly converted photographers) want to shoot video wide open while they would get much better results by using a small aperture. Unless your storytelling requires strong subject isolation, an aperture of f4-5.6 is fine for most CU and medium shots.

Let say that you really need a lens with wider aperture. What could one get for selling the lens? While the choice is quite easy for most photographer, since they will pull some more cash out of their wallet and go with the 24-70L2.8, for videographers there are a lot of other options. A popular choice is to go with a Canon 50mm f1.4 and a Canon 85mm f1.8 . These are both excellent lens. If 85 is too long, one could go toward Sigma 20mm f/1.8 (we talked about it before) and the same 50. There are other options and even more if one wants to look at alternative lenses coming from Nikon, Zeiss, etc.

What ever you do, make sure you dont overlap the focal range and that you are getting at least two stops of light in exchange. Also think about the complication involved in a multi-lens kit. Switching lens in the middle of a shoot is not practical, even more so when shooting in a dusty environment.

I just finished reading this post and I am not sure if I managed to clear the situation of just put more confusion into the mix. If I did so, sorry! The general idea behind this post was to show how great the 24-105 is and how hard it is to replace such a versatile tool.

Post publication edit: as stated in the comments, I screwed up and invented 2 lenses… lens models corrected now to reflect current Canon offering!

About Tommy

Photography allows me to be what I want to be, to be where I want to be, and to do what I want to do ... I'm not professional photographer and I don't need a title, I love to take photographs and that is what I do, I love to learn and I always try to do it better ...
  • Daniel

    Cool, two interesting lenses in this article, of which none exist:
    Canon 24-105L2.8IS
    Canon 24-70L2.8IS

    I’d love either of those ;-)

    • admin

      Doh! I was seriously asleep when I revised the article! Thanks for pointing that out! I had a big talk with a friend about how a 17-55f2.8IS on a 7D is about the same as a 24-70f2.8IS yesterday, I guess that is where all this non sense is coming from!

      And yes, I would like to have any of these two too if they ever come out!

  • http://www.alltageinesfotoproduzenten.de R. Kneschke

    I would be more than happy if I could buy a 24-105L 2.8 IS from Canon. I guess you mean the one with f4…?

  • SebiMeyer

    I have both the 24-105 kit lens and a 50 mm f/1.4 canon lens.

    The odd thing is, no matter which one I have mounted on the camera, I have no need to change to the other. If I have the 50 mm lens mounted, I see things that would look good using the 50mm and its depth of field. If I have the 24-105 mounted, I see other things that take advantage of its zoom and/or wide angle.

    Both lenses are very good. As always it just depends what you want to do.

  • optikronix

    yeh i’m one of the peeps that was curious and asked if it was worth selling my 24-105… i guess this post does help me, i have decided to keep the lens anyways. i love my alternative brand primes but i’ll need an IS lens for handheld stuff anyways… thanks!

  • albi

    24-105 iss a “standard” zoom range for a FF body. f/4 is a “standard” aperture size. IS is a “standard” feature.
    It has nothing special but it is a good “standard” lens.

    • admin

      I disagree. 24-105 is a bigger zoom range than usual and IS is far from standard unfortunately. I can tell you, I am currently shooting in Iceland and I wish I had that lens! The zoom range would prevent me from having to switch lens every 20 minutes!

Facebook

Twitter

Google Plus

YouTube

Google Plus

Follow Me on Pinterest
  • Perseid Meteor Shower at Ward Charcoal Kilns NV by ACWaddington on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013
  • Nocturnal lines by Alonso Díaz on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013
  • Passing Storm by Gil Folk on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013
  • Sam Luna by Dean Bradshaw on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013
  • Irene by Oleg Sharonov on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013
  • Flowers in the night by Takk B on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013
  • Just fire! by Artem Fomichev on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013
  • Nanpu Bridge by Paul Reiffer on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013
  • Road to Nowhere - Supermoon by Aaron J. Groen on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013
  • happy campers by Darren Pearson on 500px

    Pinned: 21 Aug 2013